paul kilsby

after vermeer

sixteen platinum-palladium photographs exploring the paintings of vermeer

after vermeer: the cone

after vermeer: the cone

 
after vermeer (girl with a pearl earring)

after vermeer (girl with a pearl earring)

 
after vermeer (the balance)

after vermeer (the balance)

 
after vermeer (the prism)

after vermeer (the prism)

 
after vermeer (the geographer)

after vermeer (the geographer)

 
after vermeer (the globe)

after vermeer (the globe)

 
after vermeer (the allegory of painting)

after vermeer (the allegory of painting)

 
after vermeer (two women)

after vermeer (two women)

 
After+Vermeer+%28The+Jug%29
 
after vermeer (three women)

after vermeer (three women)

 
after vermeer (the maidservant)

after vermeer (the maidservant)

 
after vermeer (the curtain)

after vermeer (the curtain)

 
after vermeer (the lute player)

after vermeer (the lute player)

 
after vermeer (the hat)

after vermeer (the hat)

 
after vermeer (the mirror)

after vermeer (the mirror)

 
After Vermeer (The Seamstress)
 

This series of photographs explores the paintings of Johannes Vermeer. It has been proven that Vermeer used a camera obscura, in effect the predecessor of the camera in that it employed a lens to create a two-dimensional image. When closely examined, there is ample evidence of the impact these images made on the painter, including the ‘discs of confusion’ seen in highlights, optical artefacts generated by the relatively poor quality of the lenses Vermeer employed. Vermeer seems to have emulated these effects by employing small spots of paint. Another effect of the camera obscura was to create a relatively shallow depth of field which these photographs explore by using differential focus of sections cut from separate reproductions. Another technique used to make some of these photographs involved placing a rolled or folded reproduction of a painting in front of a second identical image, yielding an illusory effect of transparency, as though looking through optical glass.

These photographs were printed in the platinum-palladium technique by Studio 31 in an edition of five. They were exhibited in a solo exhibition at Hooper’s Gallery, Clerkenwell, London.


Virginia Khuri reviewed After Vermeer EXHIBITED at Hoopers Gallery IN 2006:

What is the relationship between photography and 17th century Dutch painting? A recent exhibition entitled After Vermeer at Hoopers Gallery in London presented the work of Paul Kilsby who explores this question through focusing his medium format camera on reproductions of paintings by Johannes Vermeer. His current images have evolved from that work and from an exhibition and book entitled The Seer and the Seen in which he explored the intensity of the gaze, both photographic and painterly. Here reproductions of paintings were torn, cut, burned, collaged and added to with objects before being photographed. This recent work is not so radical; the manipulations are more subtle - and limited to the work of one painter, Vermeer. Vermeer seems an appropriate choice as it is now confirmed that he used a 'camera obscura' in planning his paintings. (See Philip Steadman and David Hockney). If the photographic image from the 'camera obscura' was the beginning of a painting, then Paul's use of his camera - just another box with a lens attached - to make a final image seems to complete a circle. Optical seeing through use of the Camera Obscura is what gives the paintings their very modern-seeming veracity; when photographed, the stillness in the painting becomes transformed into a photographic caught moment, just a glimpse of everyday life. By using a particular quality of lens-sight (as opposed to painterly eye-sight), depth of field or differential focus, Paul manages to turn the timelessness of a painting into a filmic encapsulation of specific time. What was in a painting a stilled gaze becomes in the photograph a momentarily captured glance. Whereas the paintings are theatrical, geometrically composed and precisely lit, the photographs of them become film stills, incomplete and questioning. The use of parts of pictures, geometric interferences and of half drawn curtains seems to refer to and augment this transformation. The one image which seems to me to sum up the relationship of painting to photograph is The Geographer in which cones extend out from the geographer's eye to the near window and from his hand across to the opposite side of the frame. The eye and the gesture of hands are constant themes in all the images and are both involved in the transformations from painterly to photographic meaning. And it seems to ask the eternal question, what produces the 'art', hand or eye? Is he trying to chart the future of image making? Finally, it is fitting that these images were printed large, as large as some paintings (20"x24") and using the long tonalities of the 19th century platinum/palladium process, he has transformed the delicate light and rich colours of the original paintings into the equally sensuous and glowing tones of a photographic print. Paul worked very closely with the printers at 31 Studio to make both the large computer generated negatives and from them contact prints on the coated watercolour paper. These sixteen beautiful prints, homages to Vermeer, when hung in the elegant space of Hoopers Gallery, were a delight to both eye and mind. 

©Virginia Khuri